Wednesday, February 13, 2013

McGraw-Hill Is Still a Good Buy Despite S&P Lawsuit

Despite the recent lawsuit filed by the Justice Department against McGraw-Hill Financial Inc (MHFI) and Standard & Poor’s, which alleges the company knowingly issued inflated positive ratings to mortgage securities and lenders from September 2004 to October 2007, it’s unlikely that the outcome of the suit will negatively impact the long-term stability of the company or the ratings industry as a whole.

Both McGraw-Hill and Moody’s Corporation (MCO) stock prices have already dropped as investors learned of the suit last week, apparently amid fears of billions of dollars in fines and restitution coupled with the potential for an endless stream of subsequent lawsuits. While the short-term outlook for the world’s largest ratings companies may appear bleak, these stocks still have a place in portfolios with time horizons beyond the next few years.

It’s no secret that the public has a long-term memory deficiency when it comes to corporate scandals, or any scandal for that matter. The case against McGraw-Hill will, like the countless charges that have been filed over the years against other companies for various egregious or negligent actions, fade into the background. The public eye will soon be focused on the next CEO screw up, the next politician’s extramarital affair, or some other Wall Street mashup of The Young & The Restless.

However, the public’s insatiable thirst for new gossip is not the only reason that McGraw-Hill will survive the DOJ’s lawsuit. The company’s financials are strong, so even if the case isn’t settled for a lesser amount and the court orders McGraw-Hill to pay the proposed $5 billion fine, it’s unlikely that the penalty will be little more than collateral damage.

Business will continue, and the mortgage ratings scandal will become a mere hiccup on the timeline of the company’s century-long history. Even in the face of the government's fraud lawsuit, and the subsequent 25% decline in share price, the company still reported earnings-per-share expectations for 2013 to range from $3.10-$3.20.

There’s also the possibility that this case could be settled for a lesser amount, or dragged through the legal process at such a snail’s pace that by the time any money is actually due from the defendant, necessary preparations will have already been completed to adequately protect the company’s balance sheet. Undoubtedly, Moody's is already engaging in similar economic shuffling to prepare for its own battle with the Justice Department.

Aside from the general public’s short-term supermarket tabloid mentality, plus the billions of dollars in cash and market capitalization possessed by the ratings companies, the simple fact that Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, and to a lesser extent, Fitch, have a monopoly on the ratings industry will assure their continued existence, regardless of the outcome of the Justice Department’s fraud lawsuit.

Over 96% of ratings are issued by these three companies, and the immense obstacles a smaller competitor would have to overcome to gain SEC approval before selling similar ratings make it highly unlikely that S&P or Moody’s will ever be replaced.




This article is a Twisted Nonsense Exclusive! (02/13/2013)